375A naturally cooled CCS2

If a fast charger overheats, it slows down. When current drops, sessions get longer, queues build, and revenue per bay falls. Cable cooling is what keeps current high for longer—so drivers leave sooner and your site earns more in the same hour. This guide keeps the engineering right but speaks in plain language, so operations, product, and facilities teams can make a confident choice.     Why cooling matters Most EVs take their highest power early in the session. That window is exactly when a hot afternoon, tight equipment rooms, or back-to-back use can push hardware toward thermal limits. If your cable can hold current through those first 10–15 minutes, dwell time drops across the queue. Cooling is not a spec sheet ornament—it’s the difference between a smooth peak and a congested site.     Two architectures at a glance Air-cooled (naturally cooled) DC cables keep things simple. There’s no liquid loop. You manage heat with conductor size, strand design, and jacketing. The upside is fewer parts, a lighter feel, and lean maintenance. The tradeoff is sensitivity to ambient heat and a practical ceiling on how much current you can hold for how long. Liquid-cooled cables add a compact, closed loop built into the cable and connector path. A small pump and heat exchanger carry heat away so the system can hold higher current deeper into the state-of-charge window. The upside is resilience in hot weather and busy peaks. The tradeoff is more components to monitor and service at planned intervals.     Side-by-side comparison Cooling method Sustained current (typical practice) Heat sensitivity Typical use case PM needs Ergonomics Air-cooled Mid-power sessions, commonly up to the ~375 A class depending on site and climate Higher—ambient heat drives earlier taper Mixed-use public posts, workplace sites, predictable fleet turns Light: visual checks, cleaning, strain-relief/holster wear Lighter, simpler handling Liquid-cooled High sustained current; commonly a ~500 A class with short higher peaks depending on ecosystem Lower—holds current better in hot weather and back-to-back use Highway hubs, heavy-duty depots, high-throughput corridors Moderate: coolant level/quality, seals, pump duty logs Heavier; benefits from cable management Notes: Ranges reflect common market positioning; always size to your cabinet, inlet standard, and site conditions.     When each one wins Choose air-cooled when your median peak-hour session sits in the mid-power band, your climate is moderate, and you value simple upkeep. That often fits public posts near retail, workplace charging, and fleet depots with predictable dwell times. You’ll appreciate the lighter handling and straightforward inspections.   Choose liquid-cooled when your promise to drivers depends on holding high current during busy windows or in hot environments. Think highway hubs where short “splash-and-go” stops rule, or city sites where afternoon heat and back-to-back sessions are the norm. Being able to hold current deeper into the charge curve will shave minutes off peak sessions and move the queue faster.   Maintenance & uptime Air-cooled setups run on the basics: keep the mating face clean, confirm latch function, check strain-relief, and watch holster wear. Liquid-cooled adds a few routine items: check coolant level and concentration, inspect seals and quick-connects, and review pump duty logs. None of this is complex; the key is to put the checks on a simple schedule so small issues never become downtime.   Ergonomics & site design Good cable management makes every system feel better. Ceiling reels or swing-arms shorten the reach so the connector “floats” near the vehicle. Place holsters close to the parking envelope so drivers don’t drag the cable across the ground. Mark an optimal stop line; that single stripe of paint saves connectors and keeps bends under control.   Throughput & TCO Nameplate power looks great on paper, but drivers feel sustained current. If heat forces an early taper, the site moves fewer cars per hour. That shows up in your P&L as longer queues, lower paid kWh per bay, and frustrated drivers. When comparing options, treat TCO as: purchase + installation + planned maintenance − (throughput gains and uptime). Liquid-cooled adds parts, but at busy, hot sites the extra current it can hold often pays back. Air-cooled removes complexity and cost where mid-power sessions dominate.     Decision checklist Pull the last four weeks of peak-hour logs and note the current held in minutes 5–15. Count how many peak sessions need high current sustained for at least 10 minutes. Factor in your hottest operating days and the thermal behavior of your enclosures. Be honest about maintenance cadence: lean staffing favors fewer parts; high-throughput may justify a coolant loop.   Align connector standard and cabinet power first, then size the cable cooling to your real session profile.   If a meaningful share of peak sessions needs high current in heat, liquid-cooled is the safer bet. If most sessions sit at or below mid-power, air-cooled keeps parts and PM lighter.     FAQ Is sustained 500 A basically a liquid-cooled territory?In practice, yes. High sustained current at scale is where liquid-cooled assemblies are designed to perform.   When is ~375 A air-cooled “enough”?When your peak-hour sessions are mostly mid-power and your climate is moderate. In that scenario, simplicity and lower PM often win on TCO.   Does liquid cooling add a lot of maintenance?It adds a few routine checks—coolant level/quality, seals, and pump duty—but nothing exotic. The payoff is better current hold in heat and during back-to-back use.   Will liquid-cooled cables feel heavier?They can. Plan for ceiling reels or swing-arms so day-to-day handling stays easy and ADA reach is protected.   What should I measure before deciding?Look at sustained current in minutes 5–15 during your busiest window, plus ambient conditions. Size the cooling method to hold that current under your real heat load.     Choose based on data Pick the cooling method that matches your sessions, not someone else’s spec sheet. If logs show steady mid-power, air-cooled minimizes parts and maintenance. If peak hours demand high current in tough weather, liquid-cooled protects throughput. Keep preventive maintenance tight and use cable management and strain-relief accessories so the system you choose delivers the same performance a year from now.   Workersbee focuses on DC connector and cable engineering across both air-cooled and liquid-cooled architectures. For mid-power deployments that value simplicity and lean upkeep, see 375 A naturally cooled CCS2 EV charging cable. For high-throughput hubs and hot-weather sites aiming to hold higher current, explore liquid-cooled CCS2 charging cable options sized to your cabinet and session data. If you’re scoping a project now, request a spec pack or talk to engineering—we’ll align derating curves and maintenance intervals so your choice performs the same on day 365 as it does on day one.